GUIDELINES FOR A FAIR TRADE AND
COOPERATION FOR PRODUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND BOLIVIA
1. The principles we propose for this Fair Trade and
Cooperation for Productive Development Agreement are based on
postulates shared by both countries:
a. Respect for the sovereignty of the parts, which
implies recognizing that democracy is when free people make the choices
that are best for them, their families and their countries;
b. Strengthening of democratic processes and social
inclusion to guarantee the universal freedoms that are the foundation
of all genuine democracies;
c. Economic exchange to ensure poverty reduction and
the improved livelihoods of people in all nations involved that
overcomes the deep asymmetries between the countries;
d. Ensuring a healthy environment for our families’
futures and the social development that promotes peace and security
within and among nations.
2. The principle objective of this Agreement is to
enhance the wellbeing of our countries’ citizens and the environmental
and social infrastructure on which they rely.
3. The linking and complementarity of trade rules and
mechanisms for cooperation for productive development is fundamental to
counteract in some measure the enormous asymmetry that exists between
our countries – the GNP of the US is 1,200 time larger than the GNP of
Bolivia – and to ensure that both countries benefit from the
Agreement. In this framework, it will be necessary to establish a
funding mechanism for concessional credits and/or grants to strengthen
Bolivia’s productive base and market systems so that Bolivian producers
could be able to take practical advantage of new U.S. market access the
Agreement would provide.
4. For the Agreement to meet the principles and
objectives mentioned it is necessary to underscore certain elements of
Bolivian reality to be taken into consideration:
a. The history of Bolivia is the history of an
impoverished country that for centuries has been an exporter of raw
materials (silver, rubber, tin, gas). The Fair Trade and
Cooperation for Productive Development Agreement must promote the
diversification and industrialization of Bolivia’s rich natural
resources so as to promote Bolivian value-added exports. As the
history over the past decades of all successful developing countries
has demonstrated, this is an indispensable prerequisite for achieving
sustainable economic development and real poverty reduction.
b. The norms for the promotion and protection of
foreign investment should not only guarantee recovering investments and
a reasonable profit, but also preserve the property right of the
Bolivian state over its natural resources and secure effective revenues
for the country to allow for the promotion of development of the
productive base and to guarantee essential services such as education
and healthcare that are the basis for development and security.
c. Bolivia is a county with an indigenous majority
that practices community and family farming that cannot be subjected to
the rules of free trade, ignoring their condition as millenarian
peoples and cultures. In this framework, the Agreement must
promote the ecological and indigenous farming that – while it may not
be competitive internationally – is valued and supported for its
contribution to the protection of the environment, healthy food systems
and cultural diversity.
d. Bolivia is in a process of recovering the
regulatory capacity of the state in the public, private and social
spheres that promotes stability and sustainable growth. In this
context, a Fair Trade and Cooperation for Productive Development
Agreement must respect and contribute to the process of strengthening
the capacity to ensure efficient and balanced regulation of economic,
social, cultural and environmental activities.
e. To compensate for the profound existing
asymmetries it is necessary to design trade rules based on special and
differential treatment that take into consideration Bolivia’s economic
reality. These rules should include:
• Coverage and a calendar that is more flexible and favorable for Bolivia;
• The continuation of non-reciprocal trade opening that have contributed to trade between Bolivia and the US;
• Flexibility for Bolivia in relation to various
norms in the areas of investment, services, intellectual property and
government purchases that are decisive for poverty reduction.
5. In the same manner that the United States insists
that there are matters that are not subject to negotiation in a
bilateral agreement, or that require special treatment, such as
agriculture subsidies, national security, and others, Bolivia will
assert in its trade negotiations its sovereign rights to:
a. Guarantee access to affordable generic medicines
and access to medical treatments, entailing exclusion from agreements
patent-related rights that undermine Bolivia’s ability to implement
fully the 2001 Doha agreements, and preserving at a minimum the
flexibilities contained in the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual
Property Rights (TRIPS) and implementing the Doha Declaration on Public
Health and TRIPS.
b. Protect from theft, expropriation or
monopolization Bolivia's wealth of traditional knowledge and rich
biodiversity, through measures such as the exclusion from patentability
plants, animals and living materials;
c. Maintain and broaden mechanisms for building
domestic markets and national production capacity, such as the Compro
Boliviano;
d. Promote foreign investment that guarantees
transparency and appropriate technology transfer; utilization of local
raw materials and inputs; hiring of national labor and respect for
domestic environmental and labor policy;
e. Guarantee transparent, accessible, efficient and
effective mechanisms for resolving investment disputes in the framework
of the jurisdictions established by the Bolivian Constitution and
national laws and, as was agreed in the U.S.-Australia FTA, restrict
application of the investor-state mechanisms;
f. Ensure universal access by Bolivian’s to essential
services, including strengthening the regulatory capacity and provision
of essential services by the public sector.
g. Protect cultural goods and services in the
framework of the UNESCO “Convention on the Protection and Promotion of
the Diversity of Cultural Expressions” of October 2005.
6. This Fair Trade and Cooperation for Productive
Development Agreement must take into consideration the timing and
democratic processes internal to each of the parts, including the U.S.
electoral process and congressional trade agreement consideration
mechanisms and the Bolivian Constituent Assembly process, now underway,
that will reform our political system to secure democratic inclusion of
all sectors in Bolivia. In this context it is necessary to set
sufficiently flexible and open negotiating frameworks in accordance the
aforementioned processes and internal democratic mechanisms.
7. Respect for the above principles demonstrates why
an Agreement of this nature cannot be achieved through a process that
is based on signing onto an FTA signed by neighboring
countries. Thus, both countries must be sufficiently open
and creative to find a format for the Agreement and a process of
negotiation that satisfies the realities and necessities of the Parties.
8. To achieve a frank, open, constructive, immediate
and serious negotiation, without any pressures, Bolivia proposes
initiating, as soon as possible, discussions at the highest level to
implement a creative process towards Fair Trade and Cooperation for
Productive Development Agreement.
|
|
||||
|
Presentación
Anteriores meses
|
Bolivian Government guidelines for a fair trade and cooperation treaty with the US
|
Search
Enlaces nacionales
Enlaces internacionales
Civiblog Core Links
|
||